Mocking the Router in Jest for Component Testing
Testing React components that rely on routing can be challenging. When a component uses hooks like useNavigate or useLocation from a routing library (like React Router), directly testing it in isolation can lead to errors or unpredictable behavior. This challenge will guide you through creating a robust mock for the React Router's useNavigate and useLocation hooks to enable effective component testing with Jest.
Problem Description
Your task is to create a Jest mock for key functions of the React Router library, specifically useNavigate and useLocation. This mock will allow you to test components that depend on these router functionalities without needing a full routing setup.
Key Requirements:
- Mock
useNavigate: The mock should allow you to track calls to thenavigatefunction, including the arguments passed to it. It should also expose a way to simulate different navigation states if necessary. - Mock
useLocation: The mock should return a predictablelocationobject that can be controlled during tests, allowing you to simulate different URLs and their states. - Integration with Jest: The mock should be easily importable and usable within your Jest test files.
- Flexibility: The mock should be flexible enough to handle various test scenarios without requiring extensive setup for each test.
Expected Behavior:
When a component under test calls useNavigate(), it should receive a mock function that records its usage. When it calls useLocation(), it should receive a mock location object.
Edge Cases:
- Testing components that conditionally render based on the current location.
- Testing components that trigger navigation on user interaction (e.g., button click).
- Testing components that rely on location state (e.g.,
location.state).
Examples
Example 1: Mocking useNavigate
Let's say you have a LoginButton component that calls navigate('/dashboard') when clicked.
// src/components/LoginButton.tsx
import React from 'react';
import { useNavigate } from 'react-router-dom';
const LoginButton: React.FC = () => {
const navigate = useNavigate();
const handleLogin = () => {
navigate('/dashboard');
};
return <button onClick={handleLogin}>Login</button>;
};
export default LoginButton;
Your test would look like this:
// src/components/LoginButton.test.tsx
import React from 'react';
import { render, screen, fireEvent } from '@testing-library/react';
import LoginButton from './LoginButton';
import { useNavigate } from 'react-router-dom'; // Import from the actual library
// Mock useNavigate before any imports that might use it
const mockNavigate = jest.fn();
jest.mock('react-router-dom', () => ({
...jest.requireActual('react-router-dom'), // Keep other exports
useNavigate: () => mockNavigate,
}));
describe('LoginButton', () => {
beforeEach(() => {
// Clear mock calls before each test
mockNavigate.mockClear();
});
test('calls navigate with correct path when clicked', () => {
render(<LoginButton />);
const button = screen.getByRole('button', { name: /login/i });
fireEvent.click(button);
expect(mockNavigate).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
expect(mockNavigate).toHaveBeenCalledWith('/dashboard');
});
});
Example 2: Mocking useLocation
Consider a UserProfile component that displays a user ID from the URL.
// src/components/UserProfile.tsx
import React from 'react';
import { useLocation } from 'react-router-dom';
const UserProfile: React.FC = () => {
const location = useLocation();
const userId = (location.pathname.split('/').pop() as string) || 'unknown';
return <div>User ID: {userId}</div>;
};
export default UserProfile;
Your test would look like this:
// src/components/UserProfile.test.tsx
import React from 'react';
import { render, screen } from '@testing-library/react';
import UserProfile from './UserProfile';
import { useLocation } from 'react-router-dom';
// Mock useLocation before any imports that might use it
const mockLocation = { pathname: '', search: '', hash: '', state: null, key: '' };
jest.mock('react-router-dom', () => ({
...jest.requireActual('react-router-dom'),
useLocation: () => mockLocation,
}));
describe('UserProfile', () => {
test('displays the correct user ID based on location', () => {
// Set the mock location for this specific test
(useLocation as jest.Mock).mockReturnValue({
...mockLocation,
pathname: '/users/123',
});
render(<UserProfile />);
expect(screen.getByText('User ID: 123')).toBeInTheDocument();
});
test('displays "unknown" when no user ID is present', () => {
(useLocation as jest.Mock).mockReturnValue({
...mockLocation,
pathname: '/users/',
});
render(<UserProfile />);
expect(screen.getByText('User ID: unknown')).toBeInTheDocument();
});
});
Example 3: Combined Mocking and State
Testing a component that navigates and relies on location state.
// src/components/ProductDetail.tsx
import React from 'react';
import { useLocation, useNavigate } from 'react-router-dom';
interface Product {
id: string;
name: string;
}
const ProductDetail: React.FC = () => {
const location = useLocation();
const navigate = useNavigate();
const product = location.state as Product | null;
const handleGoBack = () => {
navigate('/');
};
if (!product) {
return <div>Product not found.</div>;
}
return (
<div>
<h1>{product.name}</h1>
<p>ID: {product.id}</p>
<button onClick={handleGoBack}>Go Back</button>
</div>
);
};
export default ProductDetail;
Your test would require a more sophisticated mock setup:
// src/components/ProductDetail.test.tsx
import React from 'react';
import { render, screen, fireEvent } from '@testing-library/react';
import ProductDetail from './ProductDetail';
import { useLocation, useNavigate } from 'react-router-dom';
// Create a factory function for creating mocks
const createMockRouter = () => {
const mockNavigate = jest.fn();
const mockLocation = {
pathname: '',
search: '',
hash: '',
state: null,
key: '',
};
jest.mock('react-router-dom', () => ({
...jest.requireActual('react-router-dom'),
useNavigate: () => mockNavigate,
useLocation: () => mockLocation,
}));
return { mockNavigate, mockLocation };
};
describe('ProductDetail', () => {
let mockNavigate: jest.Mock;
let mockLocation: { pathname: string; search: string; hash: string; state: any; key: string };
beforeEach(() => {
// Reset mocks for each test
jest.resetModules(); // Crucial to re-mock after reset
const routerMocks = createMockRouter();
mockNavigate = routerMocks.mockNavigate;
mockLocation = routerMocks.mockLocation;
});
test('displays product details when location state is provided', () => {
const productData = { id: 'p1', name: 'Example Product' };
mockLocation.state = productData;
mockLocation.pathname = '/products/p1';
render(<ProductDetail />);
expect(screen.getByText('Example Product')).toBeInTheDocument();
expect(screen.getByText('ID: p1')).toBeInTheDocument();
});
test('displays "Product not found" when location state is missing', () => {
mockLocation.state = null;
mockLocation.pathname = '/products/p1';
render(<ProductDetail />);
expect(screen.getByText('Product not found')).toBeInTheDocument();
});
test('navigates to home when "Go Back" is clicked', () => {
const productData = { id: 'p1', name: 'Example Product' };
mockLocation.state = productData;
mockLocation.pathname = '/products/p1';
render(<ProductDetail />);
const goBackButton = screen.getByRole('button', { name: /go back/i });
fireEvent.click(goBackButton);
expect(mockNavigate).toHaveBeenCalledTimes(1);
expect(mockNavigate).toHaveBeenCalledWith('/');
});
});
Constraints
- Your solution should use Jest and TypeScript.
- The mock should be designed for use with
@testing-library/react. - Avoid modifying the actual
react-router-domlibrary. - The mock should be efficient and not introduce significant overhead to your tests.
Notes
- Consider how to manage and update the state of your mocks across multiple tests within the same describe block.
beforeEachandafterEachare your friends here. - For more complex scenarios, you might want to create a helper function or a custom hook that encapsulates your router mocking logic.
- Remember that
jest.mockneeds to be called at the top level of a module, or withinjest.isolateModules. - When testing components that rely on
useNavigateanduseLocation, it's often beneficial to mock them together as they are intrinsically linked in routing.