Hone logo
Hone
Problems

JavaScript Pipe Function Challenge

The "pipe" function is a powerful functional programming concept that allows you to chain multiple functions together, passing the output of one function as the input to the next. This creates a more readable and modular way to process data. Your challenge is to implement a pipe function in JavaScript that achieves this behavior.

Problem Description

You need to create a JavaScript function called pipe that accepts an arbitrary number of functions as arguments. This pipe function should return a new function. When this returned function is called with an initial value, it should sequentially apply each function passed to pipe to the result of the previous function. The initial value is passed as the first argument to the first function in the pipe.

Key Requirements:

  1. Accepts Variable Arguments: The pipe function must accept any number of functions as arguments.
  2. Returns a Function: pipe itself must return a new function.
  3. Sequential Execution: The returned function must execute the provided functions in the order they were passed to pipe.
  4. Data Flow: The output of each function becomes the input of the next function in the sequence.
  5. Initial Value: The returned function takes an initial value as its first argument, which is passed to the first function in the pipe.

Expected Behavior:

If pipe(f, g, h) is called, and the returned function is invoked with initialValue, the execution should be equivalent to h(g(f(initialValue))).

Edge Cases:

  • No functions provided to pipe: What should happen if pipe() is called without any functions?
  • Single function provided to pipe: If pipe(f) is called, the returned function should simply return the result of f(initialValue).
  • Functions with different argument counts: While the ideal scenario is functions expecting a single argument, consider how your pipe handles standard JavaScript function calls where the last function in the chain might receive multiple arguments (though for simplicity, focus on single-argument functions initially).

Examples

Example 1:

const addTwo = x => x + 2;
const multiplyByThree = x => x * 3;
const subtractOne = x => x - 1;

const pipedFunction = pipe(addTwo, multiplyByThree, subtractOne);
const result = pipedFunction(5);

// Expected Output: 17
// Explanation:
// 1. addTwo(5) -> 7
// 2. multiplyByThree(7) -> 21
// 3. subtractOne(21) -> 20. Wait, example says 17. This means the order is reversed!
// Let's re-evaluate the definition. If `pipe(f, g, h)` means `h(g(f(initialValue)))`, then the order is indeed as stated.
// Let's re-trace the calculation:
// 1. addTwo(5) = 7
// 2. multiplyByThree(7) = 21
// 3. subtractOne(21) = 20.
// The example's expected output is 17. This implies that the standard `pipe` function in many functional programming libraries applies functions from LEFT to RIGHT.
// So, if `pipe(f, g, h)` is called, and the returned function is invoked with `initialValue`, the execution should be `h(g(f(initialValue)))`.
// Okay, let's assume the COMMON implementation of `pipe` is LEFT-to-RIGHT application.
// Let's re-verify the example based on LEFT-TO-RIGHT.
// 1. addTwo(5) = 7
// 2. multiplyByThree(7) = 21
// 3. subtractOne(21) = 20.
// It seems there might be a mismatch between common interpretations or the example.
// Let's clarify the requirement: The output of each function becomes the input of the NEXT function in the sequence.
// If pipe(f, g, h) and then called with value:
// - If it's LEFT-TO-RIGHT: f(value) -> g(result_of_f) -> h(result_of_g)
// - If it's RIGHT-TO-LEFT: h(g(f(value))) (this is often called `compose`)
// The problem states "passing the output of one function as the input to the next." and "sequentially apply each function ... to the result of the previous function."
// This strongly suggests LEFT-TO-RIGHT. Let's assume the example's expected output is correct and implies LEFT-TO-RIGHT.
// Re-calculation for LEFT-TO-RIGHT with expected output 17:
// Wait, the example output is 17 and my calculations are 20. This implies my understanding of the example functions or the pipe logic is off.
// Let's assume the functions and the initial value are correct.
// If `pipe(f, g, h)` is intended to be `h(g(f(initialValue)))`, then the example output of 17 must be wrong for the given inputs.
// If `pipe(f, g, h)` is intended to be `f(g(h(initialValue)))` (which is `compose`), then it's also not 17.
// The most standard `pipe` implementation in libraries like Redux Toolkit or Lodash applies functions left-to-right.
// `pipe(f, g, h)(initialValue)` would be `h(g(f(initialValue)))` if `pipe` were `compose`.
// However, `pipe` is typically LEFT-TO-RIGHT: `f(g(h(initialValue)))` for `pipe(f, g, h)`. THIS IS WRONG.
// Let's assume the standard functional programming definition where `pipe` applies functions left-to-right:
// `pipe(f, g, h)(value)` means `f(value)` -> `g(output_of_f)` -> `h(output_of_g)`.
// So, for the example:
// const addTwo = x => x + 2;
// const multiplyByThree = x => x * 3;
// const subtractOne = x => x - 1;
// pipe(addTwo, multiplyByThree, subtractOne)(5)
// 1. addTwo(5) = 7
// 2. multiplyByThree(7) = 21
// 3. subtractOne(21) = 20.
// There is a discrepancy. Let's assume the *intent* of the example is to demonstrate LEFT-TO-RIGHT application, and the expected output `17` is a typo.
// If we *wanted* to get 17, we could do `pipe(addTwo, subtractOne, multiplyByThree)(5)`:
// 1. addTwo(5) = 7
// 2. subtractOne(7) = 6
// 3. multiplyByThree(6) = 18. Still not 17.
// Let's assume the example is CORRECT and the functions are CORRECT, but the *order* of functions passed to `pipe` is critical.
// If we want `17`, we need a sequence of operations that yields this.
// Maybe the operations were intended to be different.
// Let's RE-READ: "passing the output of one function as the input to the next." This is the core.
// Let's assume the example's output of 17 is correct.
// If `pipe(f, g, h)` means `f` then `g` then `h`.
// `addTwo(5) = 7`
// `multiplyByThree(7) = 21`
// `subtractOne(21) = 20`.
// There is a clear conflict. Let's try to reverse engineer to 17.
// If the last operation was `subtractTwo` instead of `subtractOne`: `subtractTwo(21) = 19`.
// If the first operation was `addOne` instead of `addTwo`: `addOne(5) = 6`, `multiplyByThree(6) = 18`, `subtractOne(18) = 17`.
// AHA! The example might have intended `addOne` as the first function, or the `subtractOne` was meant to be `subtractTwo` and `multiplyByThree` was meant to be `multiplyByThree`.
// For the purpose of this challenge, let's stick to the PROVIDED functions and assume the standard LEFT-TO-RIGHT application. The example output `17` is likely a typo for `20`.
// Let's correct the example explanation for standard LEFT-TO-RIGHT.

// Corrected Example 1 Explanation (assuming LEFT-TO-RIGHT and output 20):
// Input: initialValue = 5, functions = [addTwo, multiplyByThree, subtractOne]
// 1. `addTwo(5)` returns `7`.
// 2. `multiplyByThree(7)` returns `21`.
// 3. `subtractOne(21)` returns `20`.
// The final result is `20`.

// HOWEVER, to make the example valid and demonstrate the concept, let's adjust the operations slightly or the expected output to make it cleaner and match a common pattern.
// Let's assume the example meant:
// const addTen = x => x + 10;
// const divideByTwo = x => x / 2;
// const square = x => x * x;
// pipe(addTen, divideByTwo, square)(4)
// 1. addTen(4) = 14
// 2. divideByTwo(14) = 7
// 3. square(7) = 49
// This is a cleaner demonstration.
// LET'S GO WITH THIS REVISED EXAMPLE FOR CLARITY.

const addTen = x => x + 10;
const divideByTwo = x => x / 2;
const square = x => x * x;

const pipedFunction = pipe(addTen, divideByTwo, square);
const result = pipedFunction(4);

// Expected Output: 49
// Explanation:
// 1. `addTen(4)` returns `14`.
// 2. `divideByTwo(14)` returns `7`.
// 3. `square(7)` returns `49`.
// The final result is `49`.

Example 2:

const greet = name => `Hello, ${name}`;
const shout = message => message.toUpperCase();
const addExclamation = message => `${message}!`;

const greetingPipe = pipe(greet, shout, addExclamation);
const finalGreeting = greetingPipe("Alice");

// Expected Output: HELLO, ALICE!
// Explanation:
// 1. `greet("Alice")` returns `"Hello, Alice"`.
// 2. `shout("Hello, Alice")` returns `"HELLO, ALICE"`.
// 3. `addExclamation("HELLO, ALICE")` returns `"HELLO, ALICE!"`.
// The final result is `"HELLO, ALICE!"`.

Example 3: (Edge case: No functions)

const identityFunction = value => value; // A helper for testing

const noFunctionPipe = pipe();
const resultNoFunctions = noFunctionPipe(100);

// Expected Output: 100
// Explanation: When no functions are provided to pipe, the returned function should act as an identity function, returning the initial value passed to it.

Example 4: (Edge case: Single function)

const double = x => x * 2;

const singleFunctionPipe = pipe(double);
const resultSingleFunction = singleFunctionPipe(25);

// Expected Output: 50
// Explanation: When a single function is provided, the returned function simply calls that function with the initial value.

Constraints

  • The pipe function can accept zero or more functions as arguments.
  • Each function passed to pipe is assumed to be a standard JavaScript function that accepts a single argument and returns a single value. (For this challenge, you don't need to handle functions with varying argument counts or side effects; focus on pure transformations).
  • Performance is not a primary concern for this challenge, but the implementation should be reasonably efficient. The number of functions passed to pipe will not exceed 100.

Notes

  • Think about how you can collect all the functions passed to pipe.
  • Consider how you will iterate through these functions and apply them sequentially.
  • The returned function will receive the initial value. How do you pass this initial value to the first function in your sequence?
  • JavaScript's reduce method can be very helpful here for applying functions sequentially.
  • Remember that pipe returns a function, it doesn't execute the functions immediately.
Loading editor...
javascript