Hone logo
Hone
Problems

Implementing Orphan Rules in Rust

Orphan rules, a concept originating from Rust's ownership and borrowing system, allow you to "transfer" ownership of a type from one module to another, effectively preventing the original module from accessing or modifying that type. This is useful for refactoring, modularity, and enforcing clear boundaries between components within a larger project. This challenge asks you to implement a system that allows marking types as "orphaned" and prevents their use in the originating module.

Problem Description

You are tasked with creating a system in Rust that allows a module to declare that certain types are "orphaned." Once a type is marked as orphaned, any attempt to use that type (e.g., creating instances, accessing fields, calling methods) within the originating module should result in a compile-time error. The system should be flexible enough to allow multiple types to be orphaned within a single module.

What needs to be achieved:

  1. A mechanism to declare a module as the "originating" module for orphaned types.
  2. A way to mark specific types as orphaned within that originating module.
  3. Compile-time checks to prevent usage of orphaned types within the originating module.

Key Requirements:

  • The system should be implemented using Rust's macro system to minimize boilerplate.
  • The macro should accept a list of types to be orphaned.
  • The macro should generate code that effectively prevents usage of the orphaned types within the originating module.
  • The system should not interfere with the usage of the orphaned types in other modules.

Expected Behavior:

  • When the macro is used, the specified types are marked as orphaned within the originating module.
  • Any attempt to use an orphaned type within the originating module should result in a compile-time error, ideally with a clear error message indicating that the type is orphaned.
  • The macro should not introduce any runtime overhead.
  • The macro should be usable in any Rust module.

Edge Cases to Consider:

  • What happens if a type is orphaned that is used as a trait object?
  • What happens if a type is orphaned that is used in a generic type parameter?
  • What happens if a type is orphaned that is used in a struct or enum definition within the originating module?
  • How to handle types that are defined in other modules and then used in the originating module? (These should not be orphaned unless explicitly specified).

Examples

Example 1:

// module_a.rs

mod orphan_rules {
    #[macro_use]
    pub extern crate orphan_macro;

    pub struct MyType;

    #[orphan_rules(MyType)]
    pub mod my_module {
        // This will cause a compile-time error because MyType is orphaned
        // pub fn use_my_type() -> MyType {
        //     MyType {}
        // }
        pub fn other_function() {}
    }
}

Output: (Compile-time error) error[E0425]: cannot find item MyType in this scope

Explanation: The #[orphan_rules(MyType)] macro marks MyType as orphaned within module_a. The commented-out use_my_type function attempts to create an instance of MyType within my_module, which is part of module_a, triggering the compile-time error.

Example 2:

// module_b.rs

mod orphan_rules {
    #[macro_use]
    pub extern crate orphan_macro;

    pub struct MyType;

    #[orphan_rules(MyType)]
    pub mod my_module {
        pub fn other_function() {}
    }
}

// main.rs

mod module_b;

fn main() {
    // This will compile because MyType is not orphaned in main.rs
    let my_type = module_b::MyType {};
    println!("Hello, world!");
}

Output: (Compiles successfully)

Explanation: MyType is orphaned within module_b. However, main.rs does not use the orphan_rules macro, so it can freely use MyType.

Constraints

  • The solution must be implemented using Rust macros.
  • The macro should be generic and work with any valid Rust type.
  • The macro should not introduce any significant runtime overhead.
  • The compile-time error messages should be as informative as possible.
  • The solution should be reasonably concise and readable.
  • The macro should not require any external dependencies.

Notes

  • Consider using procedural macros to achieve the desired compile-time checks.
  • You might need to use proc-macro crate to define your macro.
  • Think about how to best represent the "orphaned" state of a type. A simple approach might be to redefine the type within the originating module to a dummy type that doesn't exist, triggering the compile-time error.
  • The challenge focuses on compile-time prevention. Runtime checks are not required.
  • Error messages should clearly indicate that the type is orphaned and the module where it is orphaned.
  • This is a challenging problem that requires a good understanding of Rust's macro system and compile-time evaluation. Good luck!
Loading editor...
rust