Hone logo
Hone
Problems

Testing Custom Resolvers with Jest

Writing resolvers, especially in frameworks like Apollo Server or similar GraphQL implementations, is a common task. However, testing these resolvers can be tricky because they often depend on external data sources or complex logic. This challenge asks you to create a custom Jest resolver that allows you to mock dependencies and test your resolvers in isolation, ensuring they behave as expected.

Problem Description

You need to build a custom Jest resolver that allows you to test GraphQL resolvers by providing mock dependencies. This resolver should accept a resolver function and a set of mock dependencies, and then execute the resolver with those mocks. The custom resolver should return the result of the resolver function, allowing you to assert against it. This is useful for isolating resolver logic from external data sources and ensuring the resolver's core functionality is correct.

Key Requirements:

  • Mock Dependency Injection: The resolver should accept a dictionary of mock dependencies to be passed to the resolver function.
  • Resolver Execution: The resolver should execute the provided resolver function with the mocked dependencies.
  • Result Return: The resolver should return the result of the resolver function.
  • Error Handling: The resolver should handle errors thrown by the resolver function and re-throw them.

Expected Behavior:

When called with a resolver function and mock dependencies, the custom resolver should execute the resolver function with the mocks and return the result. If the resolver function throws an error, the custom resolver should re-throw the same error.

Edge Cases to Consider:

  • Resolver function throws an error.
  • Resolver function doesn't accept any dependencies.
  • Mock dependencies are not all used by the resolver function.
  • Resolver function returns undefined or null.

Examples

Example 1:

Input:
resolverFunction: (data: { name: string }) => data.name,
mocks: { data: { name: "John" } }
Output: "John"
Explanation: The resolver function receives the mock `data` object, extracts the `name` property, and returns it.

Example 2:

Input:
resolverFunction: (data: { id: number }, db: { getData: (id: number) => any }) => db.getData(data.id),
mocks: { data: { id: 123 }, db: { getData: (id: number) => `Data for ID ${id}` } }
Output: "Data for ID 123"
Explanation: The resolver function receives the mock `data` and `db` objects. It calls the mock `db.getData` function with the `data.id` and returns the result.

Example 3: (Error Handling)

Input:
resolverFunction: (data: { name: string }) => { throw new Error("Something went wrong"); },
mocks: { data: { name: "John" } }
Output: Error: "Something went wrong" (re-thrown)
Explanation: The resolver function throws an error. The custom resolver catches this error and re-throws it.

Constraints

  • The resolver function must be a function that accepts at least one argument.
  • The mocks must be a dictionary where keys are the expected argument names and values are the mock values.
  • The custom resolver must be implemented in TypeScript.
  • The solution should be concise and readable.

Notes

Consider using the spread operator (...) to merge the mocks into the arguments passed to the resolver function. Think about how to handle cases where the resolver function doesn't explicitly use all the provided mock dependencies. Focus on creating a flexible and reusable resolver that can handle various resolver function signatures.

Loading editor...
typescript