Hone logo
Hone
Problems

Implementing a Simple Conflict Resolution System in Go

Modern distributed systems often involve multiple concurrent processes or services that might attempt to modify the same data simultaneously. This can lead to data corruption or inconsistencies. This challenge focuses on building a foundational conflict resolution mechanism to handle such scenarios gracefully, ensuring data integrity.

Problem Description

You are tasked with designing and implementing a conflict resolution system in Go for a simplified data store. The system needs to accept multiple versions of a data item, each associated with a timestamp indicating when it was last modified. When a conflict arises (i.e., multiple versions exist with the same latest timestamp), your system must deterministically resolve the conflict by selecting a single version.

Key Requirements:

  1. Data Structure: Design a suitable Go struct to represent a data item. This struct should include:

    • An identifier for the data item (e.g., a string ID).
    • The actual data value (e.g., an interface{} or a specific type like string).
    • A timestamp representing the last modification time (e.g., time.Time).
    • A unique identifier for the source of the update (e.g., a string SourceID). This is crucial for deterministic tie-breaking.

  2. Conflict Resolution Function: Implement a Go function that takes a slice of these data item versions as input and returns a single, resolved data item.

  3. Resolution Logic:

    • If there are no versions, return an error or a zero-value data item.
    • If there is only one version, return that version.
    • If multiple versions exist, the resolution should prioritize the one with the latest timestamp.
    • Tie-breaking: If multiple versions share the exact same latest timestamp, resolve the tie deterministically using the SourceID. Specifically, the version with the lexicographically smallest SourceID should be chosen.

  4. Error Handling: The function should gracefully handle cases where no valid versions are provided.

Expected Behavior:

The function should always return a single, consistent data item if a set of versions is provided. The choice of which version to select should be predictable and repeatable based on the input.

Edge Cases:

  • An empty slice of versions.
  • A slice containing only one version.
  • Multiple versions with identical timestamps but different SourceIDs.
  • Multiple versions with identical timestamps and identical SourceIDs (though this scenario should ideally be avoided by the system generating the updates).

Examples

Example 1:

Input versions:
[
  {ID: "item1", Value: "v1", Timestamp: 2023-10-27T10:00:00Z, SourceID: "serverA"},
  {ID: "item1", Value: "v2", Timestamp: 2023-10-27T10:05:00Z, SourceID: "serverB"},
  {ID: "item1", Value: "v3", Timestamp: 2023-10-27T10:02:00Z, SourceID: "clientC"}
]

Output:
{ID: "item1", Value: "v2", Timestamp: 2023-10-27T10:05:00Z, SourceID: "serverB"}

Explanation: Version "v2" has the latest timestamp (10:05:00Z), so it is chosen.

Example 2:

Input versions:
[
  {ID: "item2", Value: "data1", Timestamp: 2023-10-27T11:00:00Z, SourceID: "serverX"},
  {ID: "item2", Value: "data2", Timestamp: 2023-10-27T11:00:00Z, SourceID: "serverY"},
  {ID: "item2", Value: "data3", Timestamp: 2023-10-27T10:55:00Z, SourceID: "serverZ"}
]

Output:
{ID: "item2", Value: "data1", Timestamp: 2023-10-27T11:00:00Z, SourceID: "serverX"}

Explanation: Both "data1" and "data2" share the latest timestamp (11:00:00Z). Between "serverX" and "serverY", "serverX" comes lexicographically first, so "data1" is chosen.

Example 3:

Input versions: []

Output:
An error indicating no versions were provided or a zero-value Version struct.

Explanation: An empty input slice should be handled gracefully.

Constraints

  • The number of versions in the input slice can range from 0 to 1000.
  • Timestamps will be valid time.Time values.
  • ID and SourceID will be non-empty strings.
  • The Value can be any Go type that can be stored in an interface{}.
  • The resolution function should complete within a reasonable time (e.g., sub-millisecond for typical inputs).

Notes

  • Consider how you will represent timestamps in Go. The time package is your friend here.
  • Think about how to efficiently iterate and compare the versions to find the one that meets the resolution criteria.
  • The SourceID tie-breaking is crucial for ensuring determinism. Without it, the order of items in the slice could affect the outcome.
  • For the empty input case, you can either return an error or a zero-valued Version struct along with a boolean indicating success or failure, depending on your desired API.
Loading editor...
go